Ace/Five Count Summary
If you're new to card counting, and are looking for your first card-counting system, I recommend you start with our article.
There are links in that article to several card counting systems, from the easiest system I've ever seen blackjack count systems a full professional-level system, as well as information for new card counters on how to choose the best system for you.
This is a loaded question.
As I mentioned in Blackjack Forum I I have been using the Hi-Opt II count, because I like its power and simplicity for my ability and style of play.
When I began shuffle tracking, I switched to the.
There is more money to be made by finding and exploiting lucrative table conditions than by "upgrading" your card counting strategy.
Your "act" is more important than any amount of complex mental arithmetic you do at the tables.
Card counting is automatic and boring once you know your system.
This is as it should be, so that you may apply your efforts to the more important work of pretending to be a non-card-counter; engaging dealers and pit-bosses in conversation; flirting with cocktail waitresses; acting engrossed in the Keno board, etc.
By a "higher level count," I mean a count that assigns card values other than +1, -1, or 0.
A "multi-parameter count," on the other hand, is one that keeps separate running counts for various cards.
I am of the opinion that the most difficult higher level single parameter card counting system i.
Most card counters, including serious professionals, should stick with level one single-parameter card counting systems.
Some players may obtain a slightly greater advantage by applying a higher level single-parameter count strategy.
I've analyzed more than 100 different single-parameter systems, including both those that are currently available and some that are purely theoretical to determine the "best", in terms of potential returns on the dollar.
The Search for the Best Click the following article Counting System: Methodology My method of comparing systems is to apply the "Blackjack Formula," inserting the various systems' playing efficiencies and betting correlations.
If you have my book, The Blackjack Formula, see page 54 for such a comparison of eight popular card counting systems.
In this comparison, I tested each system vs.
Vegas Strip rules in a singledeck game with a 1 to 4 betting spread, and 60%, 70% and 80% of the cards dealt out.
I've similarly tested many other actual and hypothetical card counting systems in both single and multi-deck games, assuming various betting spreads.
Although differences between systems are slight, this methodology allows card-counting systems to be ranked by profit potential with relative accuracy if we assume accurate strategy tables are being used.
What I've found is that the higher-level systems perform at a rate of profit of about.
My method of computing the playing efficiencies and betting correlations of the various systems is explained in The Blackjack Formula pages 85 through 90.
My method is a simplification of Peter Griffin's method in Theory of Blackjack, and for all practical purposes, is just as accurate.
The card counting systems see more I analyzed in seeking the best ranged from level one through level four i.
There appears to be no practical reason for employing a count system greater than a level two.
I could find no significantly better count than that which applies the following values: A 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 X -1 +1 +1 blackjack count systems +2 +2 +1 0 0 -2 This count, which I will dub the Zen Count, has a playing efficiency of.
Curiously, the ace, atlantic rules blackjack revel city at -1, is not neutralized valued 0but "half" neutralized.
In other words, I have "taken the middle road.
It is this trick that keeps the betting efficiency high, while maintaining a very respectable playing efficiency.
The following table shows how various counts rank, according to the Blackjack Formula, assuming a 1-to-4 spread, single-deck game, Vegas Strip rules, dealt out 70% between shuffles: System Rate of Profit Zen Count 2.
As I noted earlier, I use the Hi-Opt II count.
My reason for this is that the gain from using the Zen Count is very slight, and frankly Hi-Opt II is slightly simpler.
I'm blackjack count systems great believer in simplicity.
Nor could I say for certain that the Zen Count is undeniably superior.
The Blackjack Formula indicates a negligible superiority under most conditions.
Of academic interest, the atlantic city blackjacks football team single parameter card counting systems are those numbered 91, blackjack count systems, 93 and 94.
These systems represent the upper limit of single parameter systems which score high in both playing efficiency and betting correlation.
All of these systems employ the same device of not-quite-neutralizing the Ace.
Although I believe it would be easier to play one of these level four single-parameter systems accurately, than it would be to play any multi-parameter system, I would not advise any player to mess with one of these monsters.
The potential gain from using one of these counts, compared to that of the relatively simple Zen count, is negligible.
For instance, in the Vegas Strip slotsnstuff used in the prior comparison, in which the Blackjack Formula predicts the Uston APC would win at a rate of 1.
The Blackiack Formula, to be fair, is not actually accurate enough to make such a fine comparison.
But count 92, which has a playing efficiency of.
The following table lists the playing efficiencies and betting correlations of 100 selected card counting systems with sincere thanks to Brian Gothberg for writing the computer program that generated these results.
I used the Zen Count myself when playing deeply dealt single deck back when such games were available at full payouts on naturals.
You can find more information on the Zen Count here:.
If I were still strictly counting cards, I would blackjack count systems be using the Zen Count.
However, when I switched to shuffle tracking, I switched to the Hi-Lo Lite count.
I made that switch because I wanted an easier count to allow for the complications added by shuffle tracking without giving up much power.
You can find a link to information on the Hi-Lo Lite at the upper left of this page, with complete information in Blackbelt in Blackjack.
For more information on all aspects of the game of blackjack, including its history and stories of its great players, see Arnold Snyder's.
Return to Return to � 2004-2005 Blackjack Forum Online, All Rights Reserved The Search for the Best Card Counting System Arnold Snyder shows why the search for the "best" card counting system is a waste of time in terms of earning money with blackjack card counting.
He also provides data showing the best practical blackjack card counting system.
The best blackjack strategy that you can't find anywhere Part 1 Of Part 2
Choosing a suitable blackjack card counting system largely depends on the degree of skill and experience of the players. There are simpler counting systems�...
Certainly. I agree with told all above. We can communicate on this theme.
Most likely. Most likely.
There is a site on a theme interesting you.
This situation is familiar to me. Is ready to help.
Quite good question
Excuse, that I can not participate now in discussion - it is very occupied. But I will return - I will necessarily write that I think on this question.
You have hit the mark. It is excellent thought. I support you.
At you a migraine today?
Many thanks for the information. Now I will know it.
In my opinion you commit an error. Write to me in PM, we will discuss.
Absolutely with you it agree. It is excellent idea. It is ready to support you.
You are not right. I am assured. I can defend the position. Write to me in PM.
Excuse for that I interfere � At me a similar situation. I invite to discussion.
Idea good, I support.
I suggest you to come on a site where there are many articles on a theme interesting you.
Completely I share your opinion. In it something is also to me it seems it is very good idea. Completely with you I will agree.
This variant does not approach me. Who else, what can prompt?
In my opinion you are not right. Let's discuss. Write to me in PM, we will talk.
What talented message
Bravo, seems to me, is a brilliant phrase
In it something is. I thank for the help in this question, now I will not commit such error.
I consider, that you commit an error. I suggest it to discuss. Write to me in PM, we will talk.
The authoritative answer, funny...
I am sorry, that I interfere, but it is necessary for me little bit more information.
I consider, that you commit an error. I suggest it to discuss. Write to me in PM, we will communicate.
Rather amusing message